Economic Survey 2025-26 Flags Rising Cost of Freebies, Warns of Fiscal Stress in States

ଆନ୍ତର୍ଜାତୀୟ

Trump ଙ୍କ ଚେତାବନୀକୁ ଖାରଜ କଲା Iran, “Gates of...

April 05, 2026

Dubai Marina ନିକଟରେ debris ପଡ଼ି ଆତଙ୍କ, UAE defence...

April 04, 2026

Iran ର ଚେତାବନୀ: US attack ହେଲେ Amazon, Microsoft...

April 03, 2026

Deal ବିନା ଯୁଦ୍ଧ ଶେଷ ହେଲେ ବଢ଼ିପାରେ Iran ର...

April 02, 2026

ରାଜନୀତି

Rahul Gandhi ଙ୍କ ଅଭିଯୋଗ: Chinese camera ନେଇ ସୁରକ୍ଷା...

April 04, 2026

Shashi Tharoor ଙ୍କ convoy ଉପରେ ଆକ୍ରମଣ, security guard...

April 04, 2026

AAP ମଧ୍ୟରେ ମତଭେଦ ବଢ଼ିଲା: Bharadwaj ଙ୍କ ଆକ୍ରମଣ Chadha...

April 03, 2026

SCB ଆଗ୍ନିକାଣ୍ଡକୁ ନେଇ ଲୋଅର PMGରେ ବିରୋଧୀଙ୍କ ବିଶାଳ ପ୍ରତିବାଦ

March 30, 2026

Economic Survey 2025-26 Flags Rising Cost of Freebies, Warns of Fiscal Stress in States

The Economic Survey 2025-26 has raised concerns over the rapid expansion of freebies or unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) by Indian states, warning that their growing fiscal cost is crowding out capital expenditure and weakening long-term growth. While these schemes have boosted consumption and provided short-term relief—especially to women—the Survey finds limited evidence of lasting gains in nutrition, education or poverty reduction. It recommends redesigning welfare through conditional, time-bound transfers linked to outcomes, drawing lessons from global models such as Brazil’s Bolsa Família.

Published by Somesh | January 31, 2026

The Economic Survey 2025-26 has cautioned that the unchecked rise of freebies, particularly unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) offered by Indian states, is beginning to impose visible economic and fiscal costs. Spending on UCTs has surged more than fivefold since FY23, reaching an estimated ₹1.7 lakh crore in FY26. Although these schemes—largely targeted at women—have provided immediate income support and boosted household consumption, the Survey finds that they have failed to generate durable improvements in nutrition, education or poverty alleviation.

Instead, the expansion of freebies has deepened revenue deficits, increased borrowing for consumption rather than asset creation, and crowded out critical capital expenditure. With committed expenditures such as salaries, pensions, interest payments and subsidies consuming nearly two-thirds of state revenues, fiscal space for infrastructure, health and education is shrinking. The Survey also flags a reduction in female labour force participation where cash transfers form a dominant share of household income.

The proliferation of freebies is driven by electoral incentives and welfare intent, but weak design—marked by unconditionality, lack of sunset clauses and absence of exit mechanisms—has turned temporary relief into permanent fiscal liabilities. To address this, the Economic Survey advocates a shift towards conditional and time-bound welfare programmes. It cites international examples from Brazil, Mexico and the Philippines, where cash transfers are linked to education, healthcare and regular monitoring.

The Survey’s core message is clear: welfare without accountability and outcomes is fiscally unsustainable. Going forward, freebies must be redesigned to support human capital formation while preserving fiscal discipline and space for long-term development.