Long-term capital gains (LTCG) taxation was intended to become simpler. Instead, it has left many investors second-guessing their decisions. Selling a house, redeeming gold, or exiting a long-term investment should mark a financial milestone. For many investors today, it has become a source of anxiety.
As Budget 2026 approaches, concerns around parts of India’s capital gains tax framework are becoming more pronounced. Selling a long-held asset was once a predictable exercise: inflation was accounted for through indexation, tax rates were known, and the final liability rarely came as a surprise. That sense of certainty has now faded. Financial advisers say investors are delaying transactions, recalculating outcomes repeatedly, and in some cases abandoning sales altogether due to uncertainty over the tax impact.
Abhishek Kumar, Sebi-registered investment adviser and founder of Sahaj Money, says the confusion spans multiple asset classes. “This uncertainty is particularly acute in real estate, gold, debt mutual funds and bonds, where indexation traditionally provided a clear and often substantial tax advantage over long holding periods,” he explains.
Investors, Kumar says, are struggling to understand when the new 12.5 per cent tax rate applies, when the older 20 per cent rate with indexation remains an option for legacy property holdings, and how to compare post-tax outcomes across different purchase dates and holding periods. As a result, many are postponing asset sales for fear of making costly, irreversible mistakes.
He cites the example of homeowners who purchased property decades ago. “A client with an apartment bought in the early 2000s often assumes the new 12.5 per cent rate is automatically better. But after running both calculations, they realise that 20 per cent with indexation can still result in a lower tax liability in their specific case,” Kumar says.
While many investors associate the confusion with Budget 2025, the structural shift began earlier. SR Patnaik, partner and head of taxation at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, says Budget 2024 fundamentally altered the capital gains framework.
“Budget 2024 marked a significant shift. Holding periods across assets were unified, indexation benefits for long-term assets were removed, and tax rates were rationalised,” Patnaik says. Budget 2025, he adds, largely provided clarifications rather than introducing fresh structural changes.
Property transactions have emerged as the most confusing area. “Real estate is typically held for long durations, and inflation accounts for a significant portion of the appreciation,” Patnaik says. Although the LTCG tax rate was reduced from 20 per cent to 12.5 per cent, removing indexation has, in many cases, increased the final tax payable.
Taxpayers, he notes, are dissatisfied because much of their apparent gain reflects inflation rather than real wealth creation. Complexity is further compounded by the fact that the option to choose between the old and new tax regimes for property purchased before July 23, 2024 is available only to individuals and Hindu undivided families, not other taxpayers.
Indexation was originally designed to separate inflationary gains from real returns. Its removal has changed the calculus. “Post Budget 2024, investors must accept that long holding periods no longer shield them from inflation-based taxation,” Patnaik says.
For retail investors, this has made financial planning more difficult. Kumar notes that people often have to calculate capital gains under multiple scenarios before deciding. “Estimating future post-tax returns and planning exits has become harder, as old thumb rules based on indexation and the Cost Inflation Index no longer apply cleanly,” he says.
Although the intent was simplification, both experts agree the outcome has been the opposite. “The complexity arises from offering multiple tax options to individuals,” Patnaik says. Kumar adds that mixed portfolios — containing property, debt funds and equity — are especially problematic due to differing holding periods and transitional rules.
Tax professionals say errors are increasingly common. “Taxpayers may incorrectly apply indexation while also using the lower 12.5 per cent rate,” Patnaik says. Kumar adds that investors often misclassify holding periods, wrongly apply the Cost Inflation Index, or incorrectly set off capital losses.
Both experts agree that long-term, conservative investors have been hit the hardest. “Removing indexation penalises investors who held assets to protect wealth against inflation rather than to speculate,” Patnaik says.
As Budget 2026 approaches, expectations are focused less on tax cuts and more on clarity. Patnaik says taxpayers want a standard mechanism to prevent taxation of pure inflation gains. Kumar believes meaningful simplification is still possible. “A genuinely uniform LTCG framework — one holding period, one rate, and clearly drafted rules — would make the biggest difference,” he says.
Until then, advisers warn that investors will continue to approach long-term asset sales cautiously, aware that the biggest risk may not be market timing, but misunderstanding the tax rules.
