BREAKING :
Delhi High Court Adjourns Rajpal Yadav’s Bail Plea in Cheque Bounce Case

Delhi High Court Adjourns Rajpal Yadav’s Bail Plea in Cheque Bounce Case

The Delhi High Court has adjourned actor Rajpal Yadav’s bail plea to February 16 in a cheque bounce case. His lawyer informed the court that Rs 2.5 crore has already been repaid and additional funds are ready to be deposited.

The Delhi High Court has postponed the hearing of actor Rajpal Yadav’s bail plea to February 16 in connection with a long-running cheque bounce case. The matter pertains to a Rs 5 crore loan taken in 2010 for his directorial debut, Ata Pata Lapataa, which later escalated to a significantly higher amount due to legal and financial proceedings.

Following the hearing, Yadav’s counsel, Bhaskar Upadhyay, informed the media that the actor has already paid Rs 2.5 crore toward the disputed amount. He also stated that an additional Rs 1 crore had earlier been deposited with the court registry, and a cheque of Rs 25 lakh was brought during the latest hearing. The legal team has expressed readiness to deposit further funds as required.

According to the lawyer, the original Rs 5 crore consent decree eventually increased to Rs 11 crore over time. The opposing party allegedly refused payment at one stage and pursued execution proceedings, which ultimately led to a three-month imprisonment order to satisfy the decree. The case traces back to earlier legal proceedings dating to 2012.

On February 12, the court issued notice to Murli Projects Company, which had extended the loan, seeking its response to Yadav’s bail application. The matter reportedly involves nearly Rs 9 crore that remains disputed.

Yadav’s legal team has argued that imprisonment should not be solely based on an undertaking in a financial dispute and has sought clarity from the court regarding earlier commitments. Meanwhile, reports suggest that individuals from Bollywood and political circles have come forward to offer financial assistance to help settle the dues.

The final decision on the bail plea will now depend on the court’s observations at the next hearing.

+