The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India, has taken suo motu cognizance of the alleged misuse of its name and logo by certain Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) operating under deceptively similar titles. The Commission expressed serious concern that such actions could undermine public trust, compromise financial propriety, and damage institutional credibility.

During scrutiny of complaints related to human rights violations received from across the country, the Commission observed that some NGOs have registered themselves under names closely resembling “National Human Rights Commission,” potentially misleading the public into believing they are officially authorised or affiliated with the statutory body.

NGO Using Similar Name Under Scanner

The issue gained prominence after the Commission identified an NGO registered as “National Human Rights Council (NHRC)” with the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi in 2022. According to the Commission, promotional materials circulated by the organisation claim registration with government bodies such as NITI Aayog, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, and the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.

The publicity material also references an association with the “Andhra Pradesh Human Rights Council Association.” Additionally, a visiting card reportedly carries the designation “Venkatesh, State Chairman, Karnataka,” raising further concerns about the possible implication of official authority.

‘Deceptive Nomenclature’ Raises Red Flags

The Commission noted that the use of similar names and titles such as “Chairman” is misleading and capable of creating confusion among citizens and authorities. It warned that such deceptive nomenclature may falsely suggest that these entities are part of, or formally recognised by, the statutory NHRC.

The continued use of such “illusory names,” the Commission said, could erode public confidence, lead to potential misuse of mandate, misappropriation of funds, and create administrative challenges in distinguishing between a statutory body and privately registered NGOs.

Earlier Warnings and Continued Violations

The NHRC pointed out that it had previously flagged concerns about misuse of its name and logo and had alerted relevant authorities to take strict action. However, despite those warnings, fresh instances have surfaced, prompting stronger intervention.

Notices Issued to All States and UTs

In response, the Commission has issued notices to the Chief Secretaries and Directors General of Police (DGPs) of all States and Union Territories. They have been directed to:

• Identify NGOs and individuals misusing the name “National Human Rights Commission” or operating under deceptively similar titles.

• Initiate immediate legal action, including cancellation of registrations obtained in violation of norms.

• Complete necessary action within two weeks.

• Sensitise registering authorities to prevent similar cases in the future.

Separate Reports Sought from Karnataka and Delhi

With regard to the specific case of the “National Human Rights Council (NHRC),” the Commission has sought detailed action-taken reports within two weeks from:

• The Chief Secretary and Director General of Police, Karnataka; and

• The Chief Secretary and Commissioner of Police, Delhi.

The NGO in question is reportedly registered in Delhi while operating from Karnataka.

Protecting Institutional Integrity

By taking suo motu cognizance and issuing nationwide directives, the NHRC has signalled a stricter stance to safeguard its statutory mandate and institutional identity. Further action will depend on the reports