Sanju Samson Under ICC Scanner After Helmet Celebration in T20 World Cup Win vs West Indies

ମନୋରଞ୍ଜନ

ସମୟ ରାଇନା–ମୁକେଶ ଖନ୍ନା ବିବାଦ ତୀବ୍ର: ‘ଶକ୍ତିମାନ’ ଉପରେ ଟିପ୍ପଣୀକୁ...

April 09, 2026

Dhurandhar 2 The Revenge ବକ୍ସଅଫିସ Day 20: ₹1641...

April 08, 2026

ଓଡ଼ିଆ ସିନେମାର ପ୍ରସିଦ୍ଧ ପ୍ରଯୋଜକ ରବି ସ୍ୱାଇନ(Rabi Swain)ଙ୍କର ଦେହାନ୍ତ

April 07, 2026

ଜନ୍ହ୍ୱୀ କପୁର୍ କହିଛନ୍ତି: ଧଡ଼କ୍ ପରେ ଡିପ୍ରେସନ୍ ହେଇଥିଲି, ଲୋକ...

April 06, 2026

ରାଜନୀତି

ବିହାର ମୁଖ୍ୟମନ୍ତ୍ରୀ Nitish Kumarଙ୍କ ଜାତୀୟ ରାଜନୀତିରେ ପ୍ରବେଶ, ଶୀଘ୍ର...

April 10, 2026

Sasmit Patra ରାଜ୍ୟସଭାରେ BJD ନେତା ପଦରୁ ପଦତ୍ୟାଗ, ଦଳଭିତ୍ତିକ...

April 09, 2026

ବାରାମତୀ ଉପନିର୍ବାଚନରେ ଏକମାତ୍ର ପ୍ରାର୍ଥୀ: କଂଗ୍ରେସ ପଛହଟିବା ପରେ ସୁନେତ୍ରା...

April 09, 2026

West Bengal ନିର୍ବାଚନ: ଭୟମୁକ୍ତ ଓ ହିଂସାମୁକ୍ତ ଭୋଟିଂ ପାଇଁ...

April 08, 2026

Sanju Samson Under ICC Scanner After Helmet Celebration in T20 World Cup Win vs West Indies

India’s wicketkeeper-batter Sanju Samson may face ICC action for throwing his helmet during a match-winning celebration against the West Indies. The incident has sparked debate ahead of India’s crucial T20 World Cup semi-final against England.

Published by Abhishek Swain | March 05, 2026

India wicketkeeper-batter Sanju Samson is reportedly being reviewed by the International Cricket Council (ICC) following his on-field celebration after a match-winning knock against the West Indies. After striking the winning boundary, Samson removed his helmet, threw it to the ground, and thanked the Almighty in a jubilant celebration.

The concern lies in the helmet toss, which could fall under Article 2.2 of the ICC Code of Conduct for “abuse of cricket equipment.” Such violations include intentionally or recklessly throwing items like helmets or bats, even if no damage occurs. Typically, this is classified as a Level 1 offence, punishable by a fine of up to 50% of the match fee and two demerit points.

While a match ban is rare at this stage, repeated offences or accumulation of demerit points could escalate penalties. India will next face England in the semi-final at Wankhede Stadium on March 5, adding urgency to the ICC’s review.